cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sandeep Tata (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CASSANDRA-85) More tests for remove
Date Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:52:14 GMT


Sandeep Tata commented on CASSANDRA-85:

Looks good. All tests pass.

+1 on the added tests and the forceBlockingFlush

I'm not sure I see the advantage of  switching to using a static method in ColumnFamilyStore.getColumnFamilyStore()
as a factory method  and leaving a package scoped constructor that is only used in this static
-1 on this.

For the future, perhaps it'll be easier if we separated cleanup/refactoring and adding unit
tests into separate tickets? I understand that sometimes adding a test needs you to do some
refactoring, but smaller, focused patches make for easier and quicker review :)

> More tests for remove
> ---------------------
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-85
>                 URL:
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Sandeep Tata
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 0001-CASSANDRA-85-add-testRemoveColumnFamily-testRemoveSub.txt,
0002-refactor-CFS-constructor-to-not-depend-on-DatabaseDesc.txt, 0003-use-isSuper-instead-of-DatabaseDescriptor.getColumnTyp.txt,
> Currently untested are removing a subcolumn from a supercolumn and removing an entire

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message