Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54878200D4A for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:28:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 53324160C07; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 06:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9136F160C01 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:28:52 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 32661 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2017 06:28:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@carbondata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@carbondata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@carbondata.apache.org Received: (qmail 32652 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2017 06:28:51 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 06:28:51 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 9FA96DF9C5; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 06:28:51 +0000 (UTC) From: chenliang613 To: issues@carbondata.apache.org Reply-To: issues@carbondata.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] carbondata issue #1575: [CARBONDATA-1698]Adding support for table level comp... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20171128062851.9FA96DF9C5@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 06:28:51 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 06:28:53 -0000 Github user chenliang613 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1575 @Xaprice please add the checklist as per the below template: Be sure to do all of the following checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily: - [ ] Any interfaces changed? - [ ] Any backward compatibility impacted? - [ ] Document update required? - [ ] Testing done Please provide details on - Whether new unit test cases have been added or why no new tests are required? - How it is tested? Please attach test report. - Is it a performance related change? Please attach the performance test report. - Any additional information to help reviewers in testing this change. - [ ] For large changes, please consider breaking it into sub-tasks under an umbrella JIRA. ---