Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573CF200C5B for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:35:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 55D7B160BB2; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D764160B98 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:35:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 21373 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2017 13:35:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 21352 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2017 13:35:54 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:35:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F0D6B188C35 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:35:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 5.487 X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.487 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8jO3nR57phNc for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id A5BF15F1BA for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:35:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.22.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.22]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B34D3D22D975 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:35:52 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:35:52 -0700 (MST) From: souciance To: users@camel.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1493299133882-5798412.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1493031301603-5798182.post@n5.nabble.com> <1493299133882-5798412.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Guidance to choose "future proof" http consumer/producer components MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_120138_107788711.1493300152236" archived-at: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:35:56 -0000 ------=_Part_120138_107788711.1493300152236 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Do you guys have any comments on the netty component for http? Will it continue or will it also soon be deprecated? Thanks Souciance On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:18 PM, sbrandt2 [via Camel] < ml+s465427n5798412h35@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Thank you Zoran and Claus! > > To sum it up, the recommendation is: use http4 component for http producer > endpoints (to(...)) and jetty component for http consumer endpoints > (from(...)). > Possibly re-evaluate when undertow component has matured. > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Guidance-to-choose-future- > proof-http-consumer-producer-components-tp5798182p5798412.html > To start a new topic under Camel - Users, email ml+s465427n465428h31@n5. > nabble.com > To unsubscribe from Camel - Users, click here > > . > NAML > > -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Guidance-to-choose-future-proof-http-consumer-producer-components-tp5798182p5798414.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------=_Part_120138_107788711.1493300152236--