camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From souciance <>
Subject Re: Camel Groovier DSL
Date Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:20:44 GMT
Hi Sohrab

Cool, look good, I will give it a try within next few days and let you know.


On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:03 PM, sohrab [via Camel] <> wrote:

> I've always felt that our Camel Groovy DSL is a bit of a cop-out, being
> just a thin veneer over Java DSL. It ignores all the features that Groovy
> offers when it comes to creating a new DSL.
> Also I find Java DSL gets a bit cumbersome, especially since builder
> pattern does not lend itself well to a hierarchical structure. (How often
> I've seen developers waste hours trying to figure out some weird behaviour
> just to find out they missed an end() somewhere along the way. Or have to
> create fake indentations to show structure in their route, just for the
> next guy to blow it away with a code auto-format.)
> To keep the long rant short, I had a crack at a *Groovier DSL* for Camel.
> I appreciate some feedback to see if there is enough interest for such a
> thing or not.
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> To start a new topic under Camel - Users, email
> To unsubscribe from Camel - Users, click here
> <>
> .
> <>

View this message in context:
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message