Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0216E200BDF for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:43:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 009F7160B30; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7086D160AF6 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:43:15 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 86538 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2016 18:43:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 86527 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2016 18:43:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:43:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B45641A0339 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:43:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.486 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.486 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dgI4u9GZ8wZG for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6D49C5F2F1 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.22.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.22]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70197385B298 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:29:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 11:43:06 -0700 (MST) From: contactreji To: users@camel.apache.org Message-ID: <1482086586674-5791672.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Camel cxfrs or Camel http4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:43:16 -0000 Hi I am trying to access an external rest api. I have to decide here if I should go with camel http4 endpoint or camel cxfrs? Which one is preferable and accepted widely? Reji ----- Reji Mathews Sr. Developer - Middleware Integration / SOA ( Open Source - Apache Camel & Jboss Fuse ESB | Mule ESB ) LinkedIn - http://in.linkedin.com/pub/reji-mathews/31/9a2/40a Twitter - reji_mathews -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-cxfrs-or-Camel-http4-tp5791672.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.