Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:02:04 -0700 (MST)
From: DariusX <dariuscooper@gmail.com>
To: users@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <1477929724320-5789523.post@n5.nabble.com>
Subject: Camel-REST vs Cxfrs
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:03:02 -0000

I would like to expose some Camel routes via REST, and am considering using
the REST DSL. (I do not have  pre-existing REST-based web-service
components.)

Is there any reason/advantage to using camel-cxfrs or some other such
component that supports REST in such a scenario? 

It appears to me that the Camel REST DSL is always the way to go unless one
has legacy reasons to use something else, but I'd appreciate someone telling
me if that's a wrong assumption. Also, is there a page somewhere on the
Camel site that would speak to this: i.e. the motivation of using one over
the other?

thanks


--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-REST-vs-Cxfrs-tp5789523.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.