Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89AE2009A8 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 16:56:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B71991609F5; Tue, 17 May 2016 14:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 09FBB1607A8 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 16:56:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 57821 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2016 14:56:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 57807 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2016 14:56:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2016 14:56:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 44D9BC98DC for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 14:56:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.611 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.611 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=narvar-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UetgCw20omMb for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 14:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E7C67611F2 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 14:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id qo8so7536714pab.1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 07:56:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narvar-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=iPInWgiwckzb9n7I1bStzKbC9OpEVOo+b1yzHudWU3c=; b=dr7L2HWZAEXlelQ2bmN0f3PNoqVNlQB7edyINgjEI4nkxsC0scoquNwy/CGXe5zvx3 HCxRPrwzrSULgOWQU9NUCp1+JSIXEmDgmJiqQtneIs0v5TrRZSQxiukG6asXSBbE1Bbk IFXTDV4tuHzYHuQCuAuotsm9R6qF0rBLWZe25nNBm1U6A39uH6KfBX0IvKnmpA/lojGd nBANZ+hN+1iqxITHRCZOZ7rMr8LIK7HVDzwAUGL8cAEoOVLjRiMunL8AmfodMpu7AE+B B7nLeXp5JRFmutpqsbbslz+1yWLyu7794Hbdz8wKD7dvApNLwW3pVB/GoHDd1qQ2W1VM YrVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=iPInWgiwckzb9n7I1bStzKbC9OpEVOo+b1yzHudWU3c=; b=Q+FCQB9aaDJeJi+NML6iAtz3pL2XV7Gni4kcw6aCWWUp/hK4CH2kEqbCi1mwJRSAKB PeEAxwHA3jcJ0ZEobcNHaqQDV4RvGcSLfH1So/jxok8rwDZX1LOUAUj9IIqVdute1Ihd Fm3UwFOi9csUcuDV1/7F8FmBw8m+y3ka4Hc4Cxl1IIo4BFLm51rsk2tooTtz8Ymvm+pF jUkeIsRQTPZyCqhE+U5yx81tk7f7N0xNKnrxX5+HFLnqBc2xe3D6X0Ffire8mfCg98xt zcg6xr289YUBogGXdufWESQPhPbHZ3LJCcKyum51U9aeFZcX/GR+5L1jCgcQKaqOgmk8 Hs6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVD3dSIfU9GgF7b5NbeYkx+wF/aFkPe8wlq9Z2usYhD5Nz/dXOjI8MeUWJPdcIwzVL9+IxSJ7UNC3PnUHbwqffeZcaMry8zYC1P3AIrczAfuHYhzuJE7ZAbteAytP1onp6XF61OhvNu5x8STlcGo5XKPQ1lUjD/cTWASaRNPuCsVpmZbKU= X-Received: by 10.66.152.201 with SMTP id va9mr2655853pab.73.1463496999690; Tue, 17 May 2016 07:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2602:306:bda9:aad0:b5bf:87fd:3205:c92b? ([2602:306:bda9:aad0:b5bf:87fd:3205:c92b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ba9sm5507992pab.24.2016.05.17.07.56.38 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 17 May 2016 07:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Running Same set of Camel routes (Camel Context) on multiple nodes From: Sherwin Pinto In-Reply-To: <1463495138499-5782702.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 07:56:38 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8F4E52F7-B62C-40DE-B645-0CB49C8309D2@narvar.com> <1463495138499-5782702.post@n5.nabble.com> To: users@camel.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) archived-at: Tue, 17 May 2016 14:56:45 -0000 Hi Yogesh, Thanks for your response. I am evaluating our options . Using quartz in = a clustered environment is definitely an option . Are there any other = configurations you would recommend ? Thanks Sherwin > On May 17, 2016, at 7:25 AM, yogu13 wrote: >=20 > if you are using timer to trigger the poll for file transfer then = quartz > could be used, quartz has cluster support. >=20 > Regards, > -Yogesh >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > View this message in context: = http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Running-Same-set-of-Camel-routes-Camel-C= ontext-on-multiple-nodes-tp5782680p5782702.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.