Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:00:16 -0700 (MST)
From: ashoksrinivas87 <ashoksrinivas87@gmail.com>
To: users@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <1456974016523-5778536.post@n5.nabble.com>
Subject: Camel Netty producerPoolMinEvicatable is not working as
 expected:Defect:Production Issue
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

We are using bidirectional socket communication with back end. 

We send a request on 1 socket(1 channel) and wait for the response on the
same channel since we have set sync as true. What we observe is in tcpdump
collected is, once we receive an acknowledgement for the request received
from back end it is in a blocked state. If at all back ends do not respond
the connection keeps on waiting and the producerPoolMinEvicatable does not
get triggered thereby causing a STALE connection in ESTABLISHED state which
just keeps waiting indefinitely.

<inOut uri="netty:tcp://{{IP-Port}}?   
    
textline=true&amp;sync=true&amp;decoderMaxLineLength=1000000&amp;autoAppendDelimiter=false&amp;disconnect=false&amp;producerPoolMaxActive=-1&amp;producerPoolMinEvictableIdle=120000&amp;keepAlive=false&amp;noReplyLogLevel=INFO&amp;serverExceptionCaughtLogLevel=INFO&amp;requestTimeout=2500"
/>

Regards,
Ashok


--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Netty-producerPoolMinEvicatable-is-not-working-as-expected-Defect-Production-Issue-tp5778536.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.