Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: cschneider111@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <1452753435069-5776224.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: <1452753435069-5776224.post@n5.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:40:36 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAH6_LNnh=GkZ-kJGGnyE-+rt_V5gayv7JrqhcTojTHqT__F0JA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A silly idea?
From: Christian Schneider <chris@die-schneider.net>
To: "users@camel.apache.org" <users@camel.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114020ce622faa05294f9fd8

--001a114020ce622faa05294f9fd8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

The problem is that people have different requirements for the runtime.
For example the hot deployment is a reason to choose OSGi but not everyone
needs that.

You should have a look at Apache Karaf. It might provide just the
environment you search for.

I got a tutorial that shows how to deploy your camel integrations to Apache
Karaf. It is quite simple and straight forward.
http://www.liquid-reality.de/display/liquid/2012/01/03/Karaf+Tutorial+Part+5+-+Running+Apache+Camel+integrations+in+OSGi

Btw. I just noticed that my tutorial covers a quite ancient version of
karaf. I will update it for the new karaf 4 command syntax.

There are also some offerings from companies that build on Apache Karaf and
provide some add on functionality like
Talend ESB or Jboss Fuse. You can do most things with just the open source
version though.

Christian

2016-01-14 7:37 GMT+01:00 Kay <seeyunk@gmail.com>:

> Hello, I'm new to this forum, but I've used camel for a long time. ( as a
> matter of fact, I can't imagine the thing that I am able to do my java
> project without camel ). Anyway, a question teased me whenever I use Camel.
> The question was "why is there no base framework for only camel?" In the
> other word, I believe it would be better if there was a certain
> light-weighted environment supporing camel with some better functionalities
> like concurrency, extensibility, hot deploy. So, when I told my colleague
> about this idea, he replied, "Use zookeeper for failure tolerance, use OSGI
> for hot deploy, use Storm or Spark for data distribution. You don't need to
> build another similar thing for your own purpose." But I can't make certain
> with his words because I can't understand the reason why I should control
> so
> many applications for my project. I just want a light-weighted all-in-one
> package. Is building such an all-in-one package for camel a silly idea? How
> do you think about that?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/A-silly-idea-tp5776224.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
-- 
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
<https://owa.talend.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=3aa4083e0c744ae1ba52bd062c5a7e46&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.liquid-reality.de>

Open Source Architect
http://www.talend.com
<https://owa.talend.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=3aa4083e0c744ae1ba52bd062c5a7e46&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.talend.com>

--001a114020ce622faa05294f9fd8--