Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97A85171E6 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41923 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2015 11:45:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 41894 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2015 11:45:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 41882 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2015 11:45:06 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 11:45:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 60ABDC027E for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:45:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.413 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KAM_LINEPADDING=1.2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cgFVRyjVadzr for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3499320592 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igxx6 with SMTP id x6so12441907igx.1 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=tnrmJoYQH4wRid4Zg6RQ5WKIIBBiCig7o8z+U08aETk=; b=HhLeKLr0tZiWWjqnniW7qoErMW/dMQYX6gzDQpLNvfepIf2XR9vBK2KliPk2652I0p 6+fGJAgY2tEpLLBkKS+0EAnesWXCsd1Yu1TgDwOKx+9A7alqFiElyqEunujwDh2iYE1E mF4XN+nHiCgFGZsMIwTiTs13r/GZAg29eBDBEZ9uZk6/mG3s7gALwviresZsJ4T9FQBj 6AHsPsKSkSawYO8Fjdl9FpwIfrT8WDs47y/RWHSKaSKHtP4HThZ4lwdPnBVD/HPyvF60 zRCe/Go6KHSf0+lR7IXxPsnGzMtabQCVCKkZoyQvDKjdcSFv/YQxcoY8f9K1hxFZ3igS gy+Q== X-Received: by 10.50.138.72 with SMTP id qo8mr2873751igb.46.1443699893233; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.117.67 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 04:44:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1443644062320-5772136.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1443644062320-5772136.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Claus Ibsen Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:44:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Resequencer inout support To: "users@camel.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Yeah that is not possible. The resequencer works like the aggregator. The incoming message is accepted by the eip, and then that message continue routing. The this eip is stateful and based on some worker tasks it output new messages when it should, such as for the resequencer when the messages are in order, and for the aggregateor, when a group is complete etc. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, prasadrao82 wrote: > Hi All, > > Greetings for the day!!, We are working on following requirement on Q > priority , where we receive online request(synchronous) from multiple > customers, We need to resequence the message based on the customer and > respond. > > We tried with resequncer , its working with resequencing the priority, but > unable to give control back to the camel , which invoked this resequencer. > Seems resequencer is supporting only with IN pattern. If this the case , the > control return to caller is not happening , with that customer who invoke > the application , will not get the response. even though it processed. > > Could someone help us on this. > > And also support us , whether camel has any other best approach for this > requirment > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Resequencer-inout-support-tp5772136.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2nd edition: https://www.manning.com/books/camel-in-action-second-edition