Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C16961824F for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75615 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2015 13:51:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 75567 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2015 13:51:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 75552 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2015 13:51:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:51:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wmacgyver@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.46] (HELO mail-vn0-f46.google.com) (209.85.216.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:49:39 +0000 Received: by vnbf62 with SMTP id f62so15963579vnb.9 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 06:51:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=zIHdv6S7lRzWuxYHrq1gWko+Fcuk63iG+bJTqT2gQcI=; b=Pse29/e/9jKHHILO67wBnTT/WvZjAyROH9/xUj7UNwsSqCVccQ7G5tgDL6fSnPy47K cJdnOgDpddlo/4jBsLZrRhR6KFuyvzag/lyFunenzMJtzU0jCmkeRs6rDawAgrgpTChq zqaTcYvLFjXL85fBJXhvg+CVhLL7t+c7uMF9Pw1yuA8OMClzQp41/R+0puEVwz+gZxi4 D2tjEzScHFP5SJ4Zr9zkc22E0q/S+c/2Kod3k088APzZfqqBt9MZEXDJXF6MqKScXHYV giCkPnpQJFH5rFEiDPb8TtBms/1x8BiDKAlA4eYCHSeAkniFF7doJu9M7Tc7DgaRx1+/ GFpQ== X-Received: by 10.52.32.34 with SMTP id f2mr36765925vdi.11.1435931486940; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 06:51:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <55962B1C.4040406@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55962B1C.4040406@gmail.com> From: Wilson MacGyver Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:51:17 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: using spock to test camel To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51d2b8033759b0519f8daa1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec51d2b8033759b0519f8daa1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Actually I was more thinking of using Spock with https://camel.apache.org/camel-test.html I use intellij so I haven't run into any refactoring issues with groovy On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:26 AM Tim Dudgeon wrote: > Spock works fine with camel. > After all camel is just java. > The only downside I see is the limited refactoring capabilities the IDE > can provide resulting from it using groovy. > > Tim > > On 02/07/2015 16:08, Wilson MacGyver wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Has anyone ever used spock to test camel before? > > > > I notice only junit and test-ng are supported. I didn't know if anyone > has > > ever tried it. > > > > Thanks, > > Mac > > > > --bcaec51d2b8033759b0519f8daa1--