Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5482517298 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24095 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2015 19:27:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 24047 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2015 19:27:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 24035 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2015 19:27:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:27:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [162.253.133.43] (HELO mwork.nabble.com) (162.253.133.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:27:38 +0000 Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DF3182077B for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:25:56 -0700 (MST) From: Frank Ertl To: users@camel.apache.org Message-ID: <1426965956091-5764557.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1426932209721-5764542.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1426869649815-5764487.post@n5.nabble.com> <1426932209721-5764542.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: How to avoid blocking threads in JmsComponent with Oracle AQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Preben, yeah, redelivery is no problem creating the queue, exponential backoff is... You can have a workaroung using propagation but this leads to logic distribution as I mentioned in my answer to Claus above. Unfortunately the exponential backoff is definitely required. Perhaps we should move to ActiveMQ (my favourite, but I was outnumbered in the decision) Regards, Frank -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-blocking-threads-in-JmsComponent-with-Oracle-AQ-tp5764487p5764557.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.