Return-Path: 
 <users-return-53367-apmail-camel-users-archive=camel.apache.org@camel.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D8C017820
	for <apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 27 Jan 2015 01:19:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 81170 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2015 01:19:44 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81119 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2015 01:19:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@camel.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@camel.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@camel.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.camel.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81107 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2015 01:19:43 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 01:19:43 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kranti.parisa@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.54 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.218.54] (HELO mail-oi0-f54.google.com) (209.85.218.54)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 01:19:38 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v63so10124876oia.13
        for <users@camel.apache.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:19:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=8xl1jz2baPLAxDBjUiHX0Lnbh6VkMCJ7xKF2mha2fxk=;
        b=gNNTnhNP8KOQ6Y3zdV0B5pQHm+11bhvghyZ1eG9WLx7iFWwxM5iaA/6lreGWqISSLT
         1zerH9JI/c36zgpaaSuIRcgnWYS6sp4vnFVDrvhdDoKODLHjrBNvL7oTdmh9eaY2h23K
         Kf0KLhtbFzlc8nFB6bkUQj2ElzES8Bd5oe06cei4+p4GwUnxJedADlVl9jdCjjDoh47j
         RPmTTxqsQvVInRYzUQOXNF56QgJZVSWbmG78hcTeuMJuFikAGpfBK1gHlW11pOKaosgR
         OQyfP10lZ7mdP8bf+kCcQ+0oZjzWl3WgNuBX+h1BUcgtk4ikiJYJ6Wi9tv1c9nC+2AaD
         YoCQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.191.194 with SMTP id p185mr8763565oif.128.1422321557599;
 Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:19:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.229.200 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:18:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Kranti Parisa <kranti.parisa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:18:57 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CANbEgKHEK076cFu3VPDf2u_Ay6j7vLWUa6gMh9iOc4vgNOn0ww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: ServiceStatus isProcessing?
To: users <users@camel.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d6a52327c2a050d980b4c
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a113d6a52327c2a050d980b4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

Is there a way to identify if a given route is currently processing any
messages or not?

I want to run 2 routes which are independent in terms of the incoming data
sources but I want to execute each of them only if the other is not
processing anything as they both update the same end point (output)
If there an alternative approach than checking the in-flight message count?
And I think it would be helpful to add isProcessing flag to
the ServiceStatus, thoughts?


Thanks,
Kranti

--001a113d6a52327c2a050d980b4c--