Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00E9E1173A for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60225 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2014 14:49:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 60185 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2014 14:49:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 60168 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2014 14:49:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:49:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of boards@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.41] (HELO mail-oa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.219.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:48:58 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j17so6441285oag.14 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:48:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fc59iWVSTotTjHtwTF9mPWZuM/FfYX49Z5zBAwkic1A=; b=wjCU2ybohNwjIv36VGdsfJQ8/BemRH8L4aGfDDoDkoPeMRedvOaIMt/v+srb6sllvf WulrGMJjRRV4lemIzdF4epR8oI8RBEafURT7R6udTQ1iY6UDCl7MA/5+vXx1/8nq4wh0 PckRWD0MvDiY9vNa4xNR+B/2zOVX3Q7uQ2IHjELO1XLXdi4XRt5wCzdY4xuFUiqG8Yz7 v6VVbH61thO7BiVZu5Sg4Bvzmkt0G/UEXWV6VoCTvVhxmEhdkV7b2IQ/ijD6CFiY+zW+ dLqTeuDMP7BE5LGrgn8I8yZxfoJTNxFkuRJD5KL0+p2AAaOJ6ZWPOlWfB+6lhyqNnzem uuew== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.120.129 with SMTP id lc1mr20432538obb.65.1408546117753; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.169.201 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:48:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1408536370070-5755436.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1408536370070-5755436.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:48:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Camel Karaf Spring versions From: Matt Sicker To: Camel Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0117616dffa3e7050110b24b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0117616dffa3e7050110b24b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I use Karaf 3.0.1 with Camel 2.13.2 in production. It works fine, though that depends on how familiar you are with the changes in Karaf 3. On 20 August 2014 07:06, bulutoprak wrote: > Hi, > I want to create a clean karaf and camel installition. Below page shows the > versions that are compatible. > > http://camel.apache.org/karaf.html > > I have 3 questions regarding this. > * Karaf 3.X versions are not supported yet with latest camel versions? > * Only available downloadable version for karaf is 2.3.6 which is latest, > so > is this a problem, or still can we use the latest version of karaf(2.13.0) > with 2.3.6 > * In preparing karaf part, we have to copy config.properties to etc folder > of the karaf. Is it still needed with latest camel versions? Or at the > link, > version is 2.7.2? > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.7.2/platforms/karaf/features/src/main/resources/config.properties > > To sum up, I am trying to understand what is the latest karaf, camel > configuration that is prod quality. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Karaf-Spring-versions-tp5755436.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Matt Sicker --089e0117616dffa3e7050110b24b--