camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bilgin Ibryam <bibr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: one context or multiple contexts?
Date Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:54:39 GMT
Well done. I think you found the golden middle ground!


On 31 July 2014 11:36, sarveswaran_m <sarveswaran_m@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Based on th replies and search done so far, we have come to the following
> conclusion:
>
> Spawning separate JVM for each route is greedy.
> Bundling all routes with-in a single JVM makes the solution vulnerable to
> greedy-route problem.
> Bundling related routes together and deploying them with in one JVM seems
> to
> the reasonable middle-ground.
>
> We are considering Master-slave fail over for routes as well.
> Thanks for the useful replies.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/one-context-or-multiple-contexts-tp5754635p5754722.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Bilgin Ibryam

Red Hat, Inc.
Apache Camel & Apache OFBiz committer
Blog: ofbizian.com
Twitter: @bibryam <https://twitter.com/bibryam>

Author of Instant Apache Camel Message Routing
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1783283475

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message