Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of boards@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGB5yN=Ch47NF=6BTNsmA2G_oLW1fvZsMh5T3G44cPsqipt7Og@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACmp6kpPAi3hxRB1nC=AQzPq458Hw1X4GNJC8MujH0nLQys=cA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGB5yN=Ch47NF=6BTNsmA2G_oLW1fvZsMh5T3G44cPsqipt7Og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:47:02 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CACmp6krdPiWZVw9xqRTbgo0_F43W091htK5d+UYYNUieS0jvPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What's the point of the OUT message on an Exchange?
From: Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
To: Camel Users <users@camel.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2b2ee9bb2e204fcd4e560

--001a11c2b2ee9bb2e204fcd4e560
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thank you, that actually helped quite a bit! I see that using the in
message is just more convenient than copying headers all the time for an
InOut chain.


On 27 June 2014 00:44, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> See this FAQ
> http://camel.apache.org/using-getin-or-getout-methods-on-exchange.html
>
> If you have a copy of the Camel in Action book, see page 66 for more
> details as well.
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't understand what the point of using the out message is. It doesn't
> > copy headers. It doesn't signify the end of a route as far as I can tell.
> > It's not used for a reply message. I don't think any of the official
> Camel
> > components even use the out message. What good is it for?
> >
> > In my own project, I've created a final processor that copies the in
> > message to the out message and selectively fills in headers that were
> > configured for that processor. I don't even know why I do this other than
> > as a way to get rid of the myriad JMS headers that get passed around from
> > using JMS (and occasionally rogue HTTP headers returned from a SOAP call
> > somewhere).
> >
> > Are there any good resources or explanations as to the point of the out
> > message? It seems to complicate things as it doesn't seem as though you
> can
> > send a dual-message of anything by using both the in and out messages.
> >
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>

--001a11c2b2ee9bb2e204fcd4e560--