Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4118E10D09 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39539 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2014 11:00:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 39169 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2014 11:00:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 39148 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2014 11:00:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:00:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hekonsek@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.182] (HELO mail-ie0-f182.google.com) (209.85.223.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:00:34 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id tp5so505153ieb.27 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:00:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KiOOao21/pINYhm/dG5uMRpyLxXkVH15wdV8I6dDTag=; b=L1Jc20y4PBYxS2tW79bF7bdLwy8A8p+OUREr5aFlG6Giu/j244LiKLu4JJPoGMl/nv yuOXaP3obTMQKTOGrWJtajQ7NqHe5c+e9+ISvXe5q0wHXlMi9Fgsa2nT+m0HGl3xq4s8 yWmoimfGKSmbaKL32L0R1yhBhoEW4+xZrFZe086DUweDwTCcQFy29MvOXDwAeXsntTaU /MijKu1zyV2p9u2YdjAY41EtbIkI2Y4S7UCQkCdx5QFLU1vWK1xf9cik/h0wdTkexBqm 0fpwhsLG58t3JQbUN484M2tCx6rXIDNcXr+m6xIuvtBNf7QPLU/FpU310D8ZZgwDSM3z fytQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.29.70 with SMTP id i6mr25190846igh.21.1393412413510; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:00:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.124.71 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:00:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530D8C35.9080509@gmail.com> References: <5306D448.7000004@gmail.com> <530D8C35.9080509@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:00:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Processor threading model question From: Henryk Konsek To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > I implemented this but I'm facing severe performance problem. Where exactly is your performance bottleneck? Increase the logging level to TRACE and track the particular exchange so see which part of the route takes too much time to complete. Cheers. -- Henryk Konsek http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com