Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F025119EC for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30726 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2014 16:14:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 30691 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2014 16:14:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 30672 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2014 16:14:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:14:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.50] (HELO mail-la0-f50.google.com) (209.85.215.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:14:37 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ec20so1457846lab.37 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:14:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=bhJe6z7FHkIr86oxc8wJUuUCrJlztP5ZVaOQ553TdRY=; b=jFFsgsjcU0VeRx39ruE3syD9z4bY2RrAIV2tHseJ3mSAslWQ+rO5CqdVDfAh0H/hyj aHnDBTmUrFbaw2uVcYm3sZTfk7RbXOWXsjogkrKQUQ2/2SY89ifuTsxgNO7F2EdHNjQ+ ZoGtnwcMUpP+DQWWKKABCHDLOzchVrsO868fCmtdfHNGGWQX1ABs4kKPqe7sFU1+Vv2R 8jCidirDeV32L3r28vaamCCOUAHfGD5mg0Z0uo6qnh1RfpOYluPCKysB5EpCZWazqaSS GBpnMeky8q5rou73Ey6nkbbKM3g6q6Q3jHBDDUjCRIhGo9bDhjWqyNhZpH7UNJa9EYlP c7zA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.43.103 with SMTP id v7mr1649774lal.46.1392912855385; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.1.174 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:14:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1392855862038-5747604.post@n5.nabble.com> <1392906621089-5747666.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:14:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sjms component ttl does not seem to work From: Christian Posta To: "users@camel.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yah, seems SJMS makes a lot of assumptions for you. Ignoring persistence/ttl for sending to queues (and defaulting to "PERSISTENT" and no TTL) seems to have been done on purpose. Maybe we can get Scott ES (created the component) to comment? On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Christian Posta wrote: > I can recreate this. I'll take a look at why... > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:30 AM, kevin wrote: >> Sorry, I should have included the version in my original post. >> I'm using Camel version 2.12.2. with ActiveMQ broker 5.9.0 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/sjms-component-ttl-does-not-seem-to-work-tp5747604p5747666.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > Christian Posta > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > twitter: @christianposta -- Christian Posta http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta