Return-Path: 
 <users-return-43780-apmail-camel-users-archive=camel.apache.org@camel.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCA4F10ED0
	for <apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:39:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 66788 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2013 14:39:28 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66716 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2013 14:39:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@camel.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@camel.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@camel.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.camel.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66702 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2013 14:39:25 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:39:25 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-ie0-f171.google.com)
 (209.85.223.171)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:39:20 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id at1so14894699iec.16
        for <users@camel.apache.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 07:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=27oRCaQJgbf2po+UDRZylqYkG354+eyIQ3LZ7KXIIcA=;
        b=rADPB6gnzgOHLLmeyK2DG/WVCzWt2sYo1YovIJiGvzi/AVuECWbDVJ9w7tsoKetd2y
         Vw4TICeMQkoa6OkeYzyFNFY3NZA/CJJWOjzLcN/JY9Kecu0cXwMdfhtMPVrBMBJOfZ4s
         aWcAnSPkoVxB/iPqcYZuhVQN+YX9bof7Y7f7tDAzGgN9MO9IvFitFmiiyFFmlvz8Q3Yb
         1HaMciTX7v/cVaQYknP9iQoWmNnYtyGfX00KEWIqhicCU3J+2iwJMQDm9JNc1eY0cTXu
         PU5Z78CNxJc7vAsl0z/LCbgfvU2z3+tTaY0p+IxWO1jOBRab/p4rVmdjfVnpydaTBkg+
         R9nw==
X-Received: by 10.42.126.18 with SMTP id c18mr1117478ics.46.1381761538962;
 Mon, 14 Oct 2013 07:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.168.38 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 07:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1381760726920-5741537.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: 
 <CAAMK2z7gpX=oihXDkaizVfSuwhAWr7xfCpdeg6hcc06hVFAToA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1381507704898-5741364.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAGB5yNkYzjHc_u9TbXs9UYV6Y1wsbvgRHeV7zdKOmgSzR=C10g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1381516597563-5741372.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAGB5yNm84-SZeJb-bhSTVxRCLFFjcHPAKrCqiEkq0+AUvPBq3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <1381704519974-5741486.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CALznzY738wxTjk60dELU122UJAR5RkmRZcy-k4WOCtT3KcuU7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1381711355923-5741488.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAGB5yN=7GmdX8MJC84GEW0kop3BL0eYvBXbMv9axOGHYRBj8SA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1381760726920-5741537.post@n5.nabble.com>
From: Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:38:38 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGB5yNn0fG9MeqSX_q5bJGihUQZvjq_jw9H2F0=ot9Sih7cLSg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Netty: messages not propagated back from netty producer
To: "users@camel.apache.org" <users@camel.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi

Can you try adding

<convertBodyTo type="String"/> at the end of the route, to ensure the
message is loaded into memory and not stream based, so the CXF
consumer uses that as reply.



On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:25 PM, javakurious <javakurious@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your patience and help..
>
> Yes, the response from Netty (when synchronous = false) is always logged  in
> #6 with or without Netty. But the response is not always received back by
> cxf consumer. The webservice client sees the response, say, 1 out of 10
> times.
>
> However, if I comment out Netty, everything flows perfectly, in terms of
> every component seeing the body.
>
> I enabled streamCaching by setting streamCache="true" in the route, but that
> did not help much. Though, it does seem that the WebService client might be
> seeing the response a little more frequently. Before, it probably was
> something like 1 out of 15 times. But that could be just me imagining
> things..
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Netty-messages-not-propagated-back-from-netty-producer-tp5741315p5741537.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen