Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D7F010EE7 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 01:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81473 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2013 01:18:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 81386 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2013 01:18:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 59530 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2013 00:53:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of codeintheopen@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.171 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=81tFQCSPGYdlJGc6xlu9aEoYdbTs6eBaPmZLFS+JK4k=; b=bdjWmxJR7+DkQyJdXPvN2/In/8EzZGEaENCN4dVMOQs0d0XcPeWaRtOAaThrfeeQJT dKkCh/MazVL3QeCToNyKfJ4KoTk9odYn3irAfa0hwZKLqz88Rf840fpfUqbp+/NdIIAS WB7UWja7kOrPNoJumPzIU2W7mD2AnK61465ltdD/7FddZ0IRpg7CE88gYSqwkFoprxqO ozILa4EuYojyKeSPch64W2oNu3th/C06wbGO27/O00DpAFcsnHODeC+jv+UWKxF+EK04 Jy4PEUXLhLIZ1vCeMUNVytuvj/xz9+k5DQ8+Mw48hSO2gcdUo44aMWScLw7fliXWleir 9CMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.237.164 with SMTP id vd4mr13608455vdc.118.1374713554355; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:52:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1374587075888-5736133.post@n5.nabble.com> <1374595447985-5736146.post@n5.nabble.com> <1374600806573-5736150.post@n5.nabble.com> <1374676539361-5736223.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:52:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: No Consumer available Exception From: Joe San To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122f9fe13499704e24b71e2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0122f9fe13499704e24b71e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Not in this route definition, but I have another route definition where I used the same routeId as one of the routeId in this one. Is there an exception that hints me that I used the same routeId? Currently, it says no consumer available which seems a bit strange when the actual problem was with a duplicate routeId. Regards, Joe On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Christian M=FCller < christian.mueller@gmail.com> wrote: > In the example you posted, you don't use the same route id's... > > And it's best practice to use routeId directly after the from definition. > > Best, > Christian > ----------------- > > Software Integration Specialist > > Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team > V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/ > Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html > > https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642 > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Jothi wrote: > > > The problem was I used the same routeId's within the same Camel Context= . > > The > > message that I see in the console does not directly say that. Would it = be > > possible to improve the error message? > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/No-Consumer-available-Exception-tp57361= 33p5736223.html > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --089e0122f9fe13499704e24b71e2--