camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: camel - Activemq performance suggestions
Date Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:21:27 GMT
JMS default is to do persistent messaging. Will add quite a bit more
overhead than just straight sockets especially if you have a slow disk.
You'll have to consider your use case needs (level of message durability,
message size, throughput, etc, etc)... take a look at tuning activemq:

http://activemq.apache.org/performance-tuning.html


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:13 AM, kiranreddykasa <kirankumarrk@fss.co.in>wrote:

> Hi
>
> Without activemq in the sense direct tcp to tcp.
>
> No other queue in the middle.
>
> from("netty:tcp://10.44.71.187:7000?textline=true").threads(800,800)
> .bean(MainDummyProcessor.class)
> .to("netty:tcp://10.44.71.67:7004?textline=true");
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Regards
>
> kiran Reddy
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-Activemq-performance-suggestions-tp5734508p5734533.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message