camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Sticky load balancer and failover support
Date Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:28:52 GMT
Hi

Ah yeah failover load balancer uses getProcessors() to get the list to
use. I guess we should maybe allow this to be a bit more dynamic in
the sense so you can extend the failover load balancer, and choose the
processor to use each time. So you can use the sticky correlation to
pick the same. And in case of a failover then use another.

This requires a bit code change in camel-core to support this.

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:36 AM, DavideC <davidecoccia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> thnaks for the suggestion. I'm trying to follow your advice and I came out
> with the following:
>
>
>
> But it seems that it is ignoring the "mySticky.process(exchange, callback);"
> and performing only "super.process(exchange, callback);". Does this approach
> make sense or am I completely on a wrong way?
>
> Thanks again,
> Davide
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Sticky-load-balancer-and-failover-support-tp5734295p5734620.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference.

Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen

Mime
View raw message