Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1369332920649-5733041.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: <1369332920649-5733041.post@n5.nabble.com>
From: Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 06:18:08 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGB5yNnv3=Bt82v-Hi++q5UBvPOrOgdUU9kS_-A+F=kF8v_f_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why doesn't the stub component throw exceptions in tests
To: "users@camel.apache.org" <users@camel.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi

Read the javadoc API on the producer template and the methods you use,
eg sendBody vs requestBody.
eg its about InOnly vs InOut messaging style.

The eips
http://camel.apache.org/event-message.html
http://camel.apache.org/request-reply.html

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:15 PM, dancerjohn <winddancerjohn@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am writing a test for my error handling. The route I am testing uses JMS
> and therefore has URL properties that are not compatible with the direct
> component. The way I have it set up is that I pass the following to the
> Route Builder ("jms:queue:myqueue") and then it adds the additional URL
> properties. In the test env I would like to be able to pass in something
> like "direct:jmsInputChan" but this fails due to the URL properties not
> working with direct.
>
> Then I found stub. I can pass in "stub:blahblah" and get the route set up
> and tested no problem. However, if I set a configuration to throw an
> exception in the route I don't get the exception out.
>
> Here is what I mean... I am using ProducerTemplate.sendBody to send in a
> message. If this channel is a "direct:xyz" and an exception is thrown the
> exception is logged by Camel and then thrown out of sendBody which means I
> can catch the exception in my test or have the test fail because of the
> exception.
>
> However, when the route starts with a stub and I cause the exception, Camel
> logs the exception but it is NOT thrown out of sendBody. This makes it hard
> to verify that the exception was not handled.
>
> It seems that stub should behave similar to direct in this regard.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Why-doesn-t-the-stub-component-throw-exceptions-in-tests-tp5733041.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference.

Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen