Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=jtGypdM3np93hGdQnK6DjQVLRa425/MUQ98R4o8F92WTMxt3i5woAa5Uv0xUGs9HhLwfh2RpOMi/e+2O/YVZ6DDGsla63UF+L5kmjDjYt0cfYbYSRY2x9c7xh2LYPaTNT3b99lx12a/ysI7iZp7KdG0CFpVclGVqopHW0M1vSv8=;
References: <1368807741.53141.YahooMailNeo@web125506.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1368807950.96652.YahooMailNeo@web125502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 09:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mrinal Kanti <mrinal_kanti@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Mrinal Kanti <mrinal_kanti@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Future of Fuse IDE
To: "users@camel.apache.org" <users@camel.apache.org>,
  Mrinal Kanti <mrinal_kanti@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1368807741.53141.YahooMailNeo@web125506.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="-1546730761-525901444-1368807950=:96652"

---1546730761-525901444-1368807950=:96652
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Just to clarify, we are looking at Camel as one of the integration framework and FuseIDE's support for camel and hence posting in this list.


>________________________________
> From: Mrinal Kanti <mrinal_kanti@yahoo.com>
>To: camel list <users@camel.apache.org> 
>Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 9:52 PM
>Subject: Future of Fuse IDE
> 
>
>Hi,
>
>I just joined this list a few hours back. Want to know about RedHat's strategy and the future of FuseIDE. Is it going to be available only commercially (continue as is) or are there any plans to open source it like other RedHat offerings or say move it to the Eclipse foundation?
>
>This would help us a lot in the tooling/productivity aspect during evaluation of integration frameworks. 
>
>
>Regards,
>Mrinal
>
>
>
---1546730761-525901444-1368807950=:96652--