camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fladnag <flad...@zerezo.com>
Subject Exchange.isTransacted, splitter and direct
Date Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:26:14 GMT
Hi,

The fuse documentation said that we can break a transacted route into
fragment with direct component :
http://fusesource.com/docs/router/2.8/transactions/TxnDemarcation-ByMarking.html#TxnDemarcation-ByMarking-BreakingARoute
but the Exchange.isTransacted() method does not return the same result in my
splitter route, with or without use of direct endpoint.

Test environment : 
Camel : 2.8.5 & 2.10.4
ServiceMix : 4.4.2 & 4.5.1

in & out are ActiveMQ endpoints.



The results for the "a z e" message are :
With transacted :
    215 -    before direct : Transacted ?  true / UOW :      
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-1-2@17560578 / BODY = a z e
    215 -     before split : Transacted ?  true / UOW :      
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-1-2@17560578 / BODY = a z e
    215 -      after split : Transacted ? *false */ UOW :       
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-1-4@3298616 / BODY = a
    215 -      after split : Transacted ? *false */ UOW :      
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-1-6@10460150 / BODY = z

Without direct :
    289 -     before split : Transacted ?  true / UOW :       
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-3-2@7891568 / BODY = a z e
    289 -      after split : Transacted ?  *true */ UOW :      
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-3-4@14592580 / BODY = a
    289 -      after split : Transacted ?  *true */ UOW :      
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-3-6@11155716 / BODY = z

With two transacted :
    304 -    before direct : Transacted ?  true / UOW :       
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-4-2@7830155 / BODY = a z e
    304 -     before split : Transacted ?  true / UOW :       
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-4-2@7830155 / BODY = a z e
    304 -      after split : Transacted ?  *true */ UOW :       
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-4-4@5193228 / BODY = a
    304 -      after split : Transacted ?  *true */ UOW :      
ID-FR-COMPUTER-58762-1366289697312-4-6@31093268 / BODY = z

The behavior of commit / rollback seems correct in each case, but I can't
call isTransacted() in the first case.

Can I use the 3rd example without issue ? With 2 calls of transacted() ?






--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Exchange-isTransacted-splitter-and-direct-tp5731076.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message