camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Taariq Levack <>
Subject Re: base class for context component?
Date Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:45:06 GMT
Hi Sven

Perhaps you've misunderstood the following...
"Defining the context component"

In this context(excuse me), what's meant is a bean definition.
You should just use the DefaultCamelContext to define your own context,
with it's own name as this one is blackbox, and it's own routes.


On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Sven Bauhan <> wrote:

> On 03/09/13 20:40, Henryk Konsek wrote:
>> Hi Sven,
>>  I'm trying to build my own context component as described in
>>> .
>> Actually Context Component is ready to use out of the box. You don't
>> need to create your own. Or if you have to, please share with us the
>> reasoning behind this need.
>> Best regards.
>>  No, you misunderstood me. I do not want to replace the Context Component
> in Camel, but I need a class to define it. In the example the listing shows
> just the definition of the route without class or method. My questions
> concers the place for the definition of DefaultCamelContext. Is there an
> interface definition for a class containing a context component?
> Thanks, Sven

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message