camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harald Wellmann <hwellmann...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SJMS and InOut
Date Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:38:27 GMT
Yes, I read the Javadoc. I have a test case which deterministically 
breaks when replacing 2) by 1).

Given that SJMS is not yet released, should I create a JIRA issue, or 
post the details somewhere else?

Best regards,
Harald


Am 10.02.2013 06:51, schrieb Claus Ibsen:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Harald Wellmann <hwellmann.de@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm rather confused by the different flavours of InOut.
>>
>> What's the difference between
>>
>> 1) from("direct:calculatorProxy")
>>        .inOut("sjms:calculator-queue");
>>
>> and
>>
>> 2) from("direct:calculatorProxy")
>>        .to("sjms:calculator-queue?exchangePattern=InOut");
>>
>> inOut() in 1) does not seem to make any difference from to() at all.
>>
>
> Its the same.
>
> There is a couple of ways of doing this. See the request-reply eip pattern.
> http://camel.apache.org/request-reply.html
>
> And when using Java code, you can also read the javadoc of the methods
> as well as they may also contains some information.
>
>
>
>
>> Best regards,
>> Harald
>>
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message