camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Willem jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Scala DSL with Scala 2.10
Date Mon, 28 Jan 2013 05:34:07 GMT
+1 for the micro-branch for the camel-scala, and we can do the release it after major release
of camel.


--  
Willem Jiang

Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)
          http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang  
Weibo: 姜宁willem





On Sunday, January 27, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Henryk Konsek wrote:

> > There must be other project in the same unfortunate situation about Scala
> >  
> > Anyone knows of other Maven based projects what they do?
>  
> Camel is quite specific in this regards as it is not pure-Scala project.
>  
> In my humble opinion the Camel way of handling Scala compatibility
> issue is to fork only camel-scala module. This approach works like a
> micro-branch.
>  
> I would keep existing camel-scala module as a 2.9 branch, and created
> forked camel-scala_2.10 module. By doing this, we will not force Scala
> 2.9 users to change their dependencies.
>  
> I also suggest to keep org.apache.camel.scala package name in both
> modules. This will make easier for users to upgrade their routes to
> the higher version of Scala.
>  
> Any other ideas and approaches for the problem will be highly appreciated :) .
>  
> --
> Henryk Konsek
> http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com




Mime
View raw message