Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jcarman@carmanconsulting.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANJPkJM0U+aTvfm=N+c2rRJh2HMAjf3+FxU6MA-83jRSJjFMKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANJPkJM0U+aTvfm=N+c2rRJh2HMAjf3+FxU6MA-83jRSJjFMKg@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 12:44:06 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CALznzY4DkkTu7k7fuCKHYk9KFsfA=0Yv4HCSaoOBfPBwJAmg9g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Multicast or pipeline? Newbie question
To: "users@camel.apache.org" <users@camel.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I would say you don't need anything really special here.  Something
like this should suffice:

from("jms:queue:input").beanRef("beanOne",
"methodOne").beanRef("beanTwo", "methodTwo");

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Mike Stroming <mstrom81@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Another newbie question, if you don't mind.
>
> I have two processes that need the same message as input.  However, the
> second process should only run based on successful output from the first
> process.  Would a multicast/pipeline make sense here or not?  I don't need
> either to get it to work, but I'm trying to follow some sort of Camel
> standard.
>
> Msg enters queue
> bean one
> if bean one successful
>   bean two
>
> Thanks,
> Mike