camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: transactional client vs transacted=true on a jms route?
Date Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:46:13 GMT
No one?
Are these equivalent?

2012/11/5 David J. M. Karlsen <davidkarlsen@gmail.com>:
> Hi.
>
> I have a route where the from endpoint is jms based.
> The end of the route will be a jms endpoint as well.
> I also have errorhandling in an onException clause which will put the
> message on a third jms queue.
>
> So in short - jms in - jms out.
>
> I wanna protect this messagehandling with a jms transaction handler (all
> resources use the same connection factory so that messages cannot be lost.
>
> I can either configure the route to use <transacted /> as described in:
> http://camel.apache.org/transactional-client.html.
>
> But I can also just configure the jms endpoints to use transacted=true as
> described in:
> http://camel.apache.org/jms.html
>
> is there any difference at all by configuring them either way?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/transactional-client-vs-transacted-true-on-a-jms-route-tp5722167.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
--
David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen

Mime
View raw message