Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C491DC8B for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39148 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2012 02:25:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 39120 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2012 02:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 39110 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2012 02:25:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:25:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of willem.jiang@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.52] (HELO mail-vb0-f52.google.com) (209.85.212.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:25:41 +0000 Received: by vbjk17 with SMTP id k17so3813259vbj.25 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:25:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iDS5Q6AqcVJUxPb2E3LMtm4FHc1h5THN+yeSalYMqsg=; b=e9VzQvM8+cOfR8To0k4DBQ3aN7F+tq3T9F6tmfjg0N8rJD2lqgbFxREr3Rpknh6Ps/ OWk7WdgtGXvam3kJlgWuUqHKemkk9X9/Nq0ZFOqdMcmZbbahmHhPu5JD06Y5nWeZ5iG5 WW7pDFZD3MqbAuDASmsECMtHwlphy7dDLTiSn03+MGeP/7ygfJl4earMLMn/Lhf5tWdg L1tN1N85+zC9wOT+xtVTlkVp6mewXsPZrR1v+NcwT1elx2mmD1NLOYp9syvghtRkJ46O wwJSx2woWhqaNxgY41Q9FYtlP1w1+nGNu9/2oEew5geAR/KyQcZQ2tI5KZ1PDcOzJeYF /Vag== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.249.196 with SMTP id yw4mr726624vec.53.1347589520743; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.153.134 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:25:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1347551863156-5719311.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1347358550429-5719105.post@n5.nabble.com> <3A989BA31C6E44349AE716471B78B835@gmail.com> <1347551863156-5719311.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:25:20 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using the HTTP4 component to make a HTTPS call behinf proxy sever From: Willem Jiang To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No, I dont think the upgrading can resolve the issue, as there is no much chang in the camel-http4 component. Can you try to invoke the sevice by using http client4 directly? Willem 2012/9/13, Adrian Harris : > Hi, > > Thanks for the response, the workaround was a success. > > I now have an additional problem further down the line with the handshake > which I believe is not camel related. I get the error > > Unparseable certificate extensions: 1 > [1]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.31 Criticality=false > Unparseable CRLDistributionPoints extension due to > java.io.IOException: invalid URI name:ldap://crl.inov.xxxx.net:389/cn=VI > CA2,c=US,ou=xxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx > xxxxxxx,o=xxxx?certificateRevocationList > > The certificate is provided to us by a third party and the failure is on > parsing their response from the handshake. I have xxxx the company > identifying info from the uri but the format is the same > > I assume there is a problem with their certificate or service but does > anyone know a way to ignore this error? I did read that upgrading to > HTTPClient 2.x may resolve it but I don't think you can do that with Camel > 2.10.1? > > Thanks > Adrian > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Using-the-HTTP4-component-to-make-a-HTTPS-call-behind-proxy-sever-tp5719105p5719311.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >