Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of dingqinh@gmail.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: billy ding <dingqinh@gmail.com>
To: users@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <1343348960000-5716536.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+QaCWKfM1-6taXSYYUJ2OfPLFtLiLmDn8+8hmTgz4LD96Yj7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1343004871473-5716324.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAGB5yN=Dm8CdErEXY_a9j4gdfi8=00Xk4kWquFZOfNei2sexBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1343264514875-5716494.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CA+QaCWKfM1-6taXSYYUJ2OfPLFtLiLmDn8+8hmTgz4LD96Yj7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Add thread pool configuration for SEDA using xml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi William,

Thanks for your reply.

Maybe I didn't describe my question clearly.

>From seda spec, it says "As for the difference between the two (Concurrent
consumers and thread pool), note a thread pool can increase/shrink
dynamically at runtime depending on load, whereas the number of concurrent
consumers is always fixed."
and we can use "from("seda:stageName").thread(5).process(...)" to configure
the thread pool for seda via DSL, so I think using DSL can make seda threads
number increase/shrink dynamically, which means it doesn't have to always be
5 concurrent consumers.
However, if you use xml, I only we can configure concurrentConsumers which
has fixed number threads (e.g. always 5 concurrent consumers), but I don't
know how to make the same effect using xml as DSL
"from("seda:stageName").thread(5).process(...)". Can someone shed some light
on this?


--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Add-thread-pool-configuration-for-SEDA-using-xml-tp5716324p5716536.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.