Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8311FC1C1 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99806 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 16:12:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 99779 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 16:12:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 99763 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2012 16:12:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:12:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.173] (HELO mail-lb0-f173.google.com) (209.85.217.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:11:56 +0000 Received: by lbok6 with SMTP id k6so6092982lbo.32 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:11:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xSUNEYTrgRsHXxWoCNRZcACks4byOkzQdgxie09zXPc=; b=R2eEQKBo3lJZM6J0VrX/FXzb5iAMlOnRn9wKxFlEg18oXZSpIJH3J+Or00SwIzFl2a O344qw3+FUSJZtEC5SsqYEmE9I6eJQcjhj4XR2EwcKuNiaxO55S0FWIaqlSNCxlj0vef bjKDPDFV5BJzsZ0FsclNCugrGLVd4bdcIHDe8wSBjx5/+s9GDKEAMcbdElQzIesPzbat 5yLJZP7rvzth6c1l3QgBODioezS8pxU3dFDbIV2EE9s8aOFntE2cwY8qdAXI3CxA9dxV zzPVw7wrAHrhEle/l5/BvxTJaP3O4SDHlC41j25OgIMqPrH5nmLuPA0zX8EY3vCO5Oxf GSAg== Received: by 10.112.42.66 with SMTP id m2mr10319280lbl.46.1338999096086; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:11:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.49.73 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:11:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1338998920501-5714078.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1338839479153-5713992.post@n5.nabble.com> <1338919945807-5714032.post@n5.nabble.com> <1338998920501-5714078.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Claus Ibsen Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:11:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Transacted vs DeadLetterQueue To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:08 PM, James Carman w= rote: > What happens if you have a "poisonous" (just plain bad) message on the qu= eue > and not a system outage? =A0You'll continually put the message back on th= e > queue (by rolling back your transaction) and retry it, thereby blocking a= ll > the subsequent messages in the queue. =A0Right? > Yes, but a broker usually have a way to configure a upper cap, and move the poisonous message to a DLQ. This is broker specific and you need to read up on what your broker support= . > -- > View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transacte= d-vs-DeadLetterQueue-tp5713992p5714078.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --=20 Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cibsen@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen