camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Transacted vs DeadLetterQueue
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:11:15 GMT
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:08 PM, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> What happens if you have a "poisonous" (just plain bad) message on the queue
> and not a system outage?  You'll continually put the message back on the
> queue (by rolling back your transaction) and retry it, thereby blocking all
> the subsequent messages in the queue.  Right?
>

Yes, but a broker usually have a way to configure a upper cap, and
move the poisonous message to a DLQ.
This is broker specific and you need to read up on what your broker support.


> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transacted-vs-DeadLetterQueue-tp5713992p5714078.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen

Mime
View raw message