camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Whytock <dwhyt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Difference Between ActiveMQ and Camel
Date Thu, 31 May 2012 17:58:39 GMT
My understanding is that ActiveMQ can serve as a host for JMS message
queues, supporting applications that use them.  Camel isn't meant as a
host for JMS queueing as much as a listener to a JMS queue.

Don

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:34 PM, prasun.sultania
<prasun.sultania@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am a beginner. I have a very question to ask:
>
> Camel has got almost all the components described in EIP such as message
> routing, Point to Point Channel and Publish-Subscribe channel.
>
> Still why do we need ActiveMQ when Camel has got everything?
> What difference does ActiveMQ makes?
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-Between-ActiveMQ-and-Camel-tp5713797.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message