Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of mccabejj@gmail.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: mccabejj <mccabejj@gmail.com>
To: users@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <1335490262000-5669042.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGB5yNmEzHPG_hV9fJ5S=fhrcy3PmteKMqvwG+cGw4agEyUnjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1335407813277-5666526.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAGB5yNmEzHPG_hV9fJ5S=fhrcy3PmteKMqvwG+cGw4agEyUnjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Http Route with WireTap -- Question/Issue
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks Claus.  You are correct the messages are stream based, and the
behavior I've noticed seems to fit in precisely with the 
http://camel.apache.org/stream-caching.html documentation .

Per your advice I have tried reconfiguring both the Camel Context and the
individual routes to have streamCache="true" (both the main route and the
WireTap).  Unfortunately in both cases the behavior was the same.  A varying
% of the transactions end up not logging due to an empty body.  A certain %
also end up returning an empty or partial HTTP response to the client.  If I
disable "logging" by removing the WireTap everything processes normally.  I
have verified this using SOAPUI assertions.  Lastly it seems that the
failure % goes up the faster the transactions process.  A simple thing like
changing the log level to WARN instead of DEBUG will have an impact.

I feel like I've got this configured correctly, but there must be something
I'm missing.

One thing I may try is moving the processor that prepares the message for
logging to the WireTap instead of in the LogRequest route per the 
http://camel.apache.org/wire-tap.html documentation  (either by using
processorRef or onPrepareRef).  I'm not sure if that would make a difference
or not.

Let me know if there are other suggestions or comments.  Thanks all.

JM

--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Http-Route-with-WireTap-Question-Issue-tp5666526p5669042.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.