Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elakito@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1331055165716-5541585.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: <1331055165716-5541585.post@n5.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:44:35 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAF8t5XtRwk_vFzUQ3ZKjTfgu1ARQUTcffsQkj0M=Jve7CpzOxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CxfEndpoint and configure interceptor on bus
From: Aki Yoshida <elakito@googlemail.com>
To: users@camel.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Andi,
I think you always saw at the endpoint only the interceptors that are
configured at the endpoint. But you saw both interceptors when the
interceptor chain is built. Are you not seeing both interceptors when
the interceptor chain is invoked?

If you have this problem, can you tell us which camel version are you
using? And can you test it with Camel 2.9.0?

regards, aki

2012/3/6 akuhtz <andreas.kuhtz@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I've a question regarding camel-cxf in combination with interceptors
> configured on the CXF-bus. It seems that the behaviour has changed from
> CXF-version 2.4.4 to 2.4.6 but I'm not sure if it's a camel problem.
>
> I've modified a unit-test that shows the problem. I expected an interceptor
> that is configured on the cxf-bus to be added to any cxf-endpoint that uses
> this bus but it's not added. Please see the attached patch that has the
> modified test.
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n5541585/camel-cxf-question.patch
> camel-cxf-question.patch
>
> Is my assumption wrong?
>
> Best regards
> Andi
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/CxfEndpoint-and-configure-interceptor-on-bus-tp5541585p5541585.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.