Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C92169147 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86577 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2012 15:05:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 86548 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2012 15:05:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 86540 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2012 15:05:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:05:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of megachucky@googlemail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:05:22 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzrH3-0006pD-40 for users@camel.apache.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:05:01 -0800 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:05:01 -0800 (PST) From: megachucky To: users@camel.apache.org Message-ID: <1329836701110-5502451.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Problem with Splitter EIP (after changing from Camel 2.6 to 2.9) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, thx. I concentrated on the Splitter instead of looking at the csv, too. My csv example is a one liner, therefore in Camel 2.6 it did not return a List. I was not aware of this change in Camel 2.9 - I had to change the example code a little bit. Unfortunately, it is a little bit more code now. But I think the decision for this change makes sense. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-Splitter-EIP-after-changing-from-Camel-2-6-to-2-9-tp5491598p5502451.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.