Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E2CF73AF for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19172 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2011 18:11:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 19141 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2011 18:11:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 19133 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2011 18:11:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:11:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of taariql@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.173] (HELO mail-wi0-f173.google.com) (209.85.212.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:11:21 +0000 Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so8246915wib.32 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:11:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=s8DNQPN3CblcgBSJrysRuQDod8X+YmUBa7muPB15X3I=; b=uanskmJt3RWCZ7ZtqdPDfJDzNOjfowCYvRx1gPhoXG9FT4SMOtylSP+NdFzyzPPLvf XxlnfGRquDBkl9bZBcNYfH291I33AKC9tadp086kp/diTSwDGqMb9IePz6pG6PFE0sLg o9w085h7hkXTnHuClTcbDpimIGSzzFwPZqHZg= Received: by 10.181.13.162 with SMTP id ez2mr80619876wid.17.1325182261805; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:11:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (dsl-185-70-204.dynamic.wa.co.za. [41.185.70.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ep13sm36496245wbb.8.2011.12.29.10.11.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:11:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: ProducerCache memory leak? References: <1325180563182-5108206.post@n5.nabble.com> <1325181481715-5108260.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Taariq Levack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) In-Reply-To: <1325181481715-5108260.post@n5.nabble.com> Message-Id: <863C35F6-D7CA-4C64-9B80-C40D286658A8@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:10:54 +0200 To: "users@camel.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Can we see the routebuilder? On 29 Dec 2011, at 7:58 PM, suman wrote: > No iam not.For every "to" dsl in routebuilder,sendprocessor gets invoked a= nd > it is newing up producercache instances. >=20 > Thanks >=20 > -- > View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/ProducerCa= che-memory-leak-tp5108206p5108260.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.