camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Camel Components as Pojos
Date Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:27:07 GMT
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:22 PM, diwakar <diwakar.jois@nsn.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>             Sorry to repeat the question.
>             What is the advantage of running Camel runtime without any
> routes. Without routes Camel runtime will be idle doing nothing.
>             Please let me know your comment.
>

You do not have to use routes. For example you can use Camel to very
easily send messages to another system.
As using the Camel ProducerTemplate is much easier than working with
low level API. For example to send a message to a JMS Broker.
Or to upload a file to a FTP server etc.



> With Best Regards,
> Diwakar
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Components-as-Pojos-tp5080073p5080728.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/

Mime
View raw message