Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1320430916315-4964858.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: <1320310817076-4960503.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <4EB2B927.7090201@die-schneider.net>
 <1320391725587-4963230.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <4EB39AFD.7080100@die-schneider.net>
 <1320398682296-4963451.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <4EB3B700.2050301@die-schneider.net>
 <CAGB5yNk7qvb+2r-sUigdEai+qCygmVPtfqT_bdLNJKC-6DqzTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1320430916315-4964858.post@n5.nabble.com>
From: Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:46:22 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAGB5yNmc9eK75Q-aqmPCQEHbUnspV8L1c7ss4uPNwAX=VJP_Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Misleading jmx statistics on jpa component
To: users@camel.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Preben.Asmussen <pras@dr.dk> wrote:
> It seems that there are at least 2 discussions going on here if I'm not
> wrong.
>
> That Spring tries to commit even though the transaction is marked for
> rollback, and that that the jmx statistics reflects completed on exchanges
> that are rolled back.
>

Yeah the JPA consumer should rollback, that is a bug which I have
reproduced and will get fixed.


> At the end whole batch of 100 is rolled back, but the statistics reflects
> that some are completed. Should this be regarded as this expected behaviour
> ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Misleading-jmx-statistics-on-jpa-component-tp4960503p4964858.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/