Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0EBA9AA1 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63332 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2011 19:45:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 63304 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2011 19:45:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 63296 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2011 19:45:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:45:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of pras@dr.dk does not designate 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:44:56 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RPJVC-0003ak-57 for users@camel.apache.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:44:34 -0800 Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:44:34 -0800 (PST) From: "Preben.Asmussen" To: users@camel.apache.org Message-ID: <1321127074132-4987510.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4EBD370D.70101@die-schneider.net> References: <4EBD370D.70101@die-schneider.net> Subject: Re: How to make your camel routes highly available when only one may be active at a time MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Christian Nice work. Seems to me that there might be something missing. I guess the quickes of the nodes to start will have alle the routes in active state, and thereby have all the load wich is not optimal. What about a way to balance active/passive state between nodes to control/balance the load ? /Preben -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/How-to-make-your-camel-routes-highly-available-when-only-one-may-be-active-at-a-time-tp4984581p4987510.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.