Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7EA49D0D for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24061 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2011 06:14:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 23854 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2011 06:13:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 23845 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2011 06:13:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:13:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:13:52 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RLU4p-0003Gf-FC for users@camel.apache.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 23:13:31 -0700 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 23:13:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Gnanaguru S To: users@camel.apache.org Message-ID: <1320214411462-4957253.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1320194911944-4956769.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1320110952017-4954039.post@n5.nabble.com> <1320187750592-4956529.post@n5.nabble.com> <1320194911944-4956769.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Load Balancer is a vitamine or a poison for a basic use case MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi. I accept with Hadrian. I have tried the same load balancer of camel with 1000 files, directing to 5 clustered amq brokers. the fact is i was successfully able to load balance, but the algorithm takes time to distribute the files to different destinations. In this case content based routing or network based clusters will be good. Regards Guru -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Load-Balancer-is-a-vitamine-or-a-poison-for-a-basic-use-case-tp4954039p4957253.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.