camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Misleading jmx statistics on jpa component
Date Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:46:22 GMT
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Preben.Asmussen <pras@dr.dk> wrote:
> It seems that there are at least 2 discussions going on here if I'm not
> wrong.
>
> That Spring tries to commit even though the transaction is marked for
> rollback, and that that the jmx statistics reflects completed on exchanges
> that are rolled back.
>

Yeah the JPA consumer should rollback, that is a bug which I have
reproduced and will get fixed.


> At the end whole batch of 100 is rolled back, but the statistics reflects
> that some are completed. Should this be regarded as this expected behaviour
> ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Misleading-jmx-statistics-on-jpa-component-tp4960503p4964858.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/

Mime
View raw message