camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Karaf vs Servicemix 4.x
Date Thu, 03 Nov 2011 03:41:12 GMT
On 11/3/11 1:25 AM, diwakar wrote:
> Hi,
>
>              Thanks for the comment. I have 2 more queries.
>              So Servicemix 4/5 seems to be better option than pure Karaf for
> hosting Camel as standalone process.
>              If we want to host Camel inside application server (ex:
> Websphere), then which is the preferred approach? Pure Camel or Karaf+Camel
> or Servicemix 4/5+Camel ?
>
Pure camel can be deployed into application server without any trouble, 
it doesn't make sense to put the camel karaf or servicemix and deploy 
the karaf and servicemix into the application server if you just have 
one single camel application.

Using the pure camel could be more straight forward.

>              >>  Apache ServiceMix 5 will become much ligher when we ditch the
> JBI baggage
>              Will it still be possible to install JBI features into
> servicemix 5 or even that will not work?
>
>              Please let me know your comment.
>
> With Best Regards,
> Diwakar
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Karaf-vs-Servicemix-4-x-tp4954984p4958753.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog:    http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
          http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang

Mime
View raw message