Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: boday <ben.oday@initekconsulting.com>
To: users@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <1314998378152-4763955.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1314958433624-4761827.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: <1314958433624-4761827.post@n5.nabble.com>
Subject: Re: Set response by a second route through "direct" routing?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Martin, this should work...just make sure you are setting the OUT message on
the exchange (exchange.getOut().setBody("RESPONSE"), etc)...


heinrichheine wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> to make my route nicer i created a splitter in my incoming http route.
> Depending of the content i route the request to different routes via
> direct.
> The thing is, that i have to create the response for the http-request in
> my first route. But i want to create a response from within my directed
> routes. Is this possible?
> 
> Example
> 
> from("jetty://http://127.0.0.1:1234/")
>  .choice()
>   .when().xpath(expression1)
>       .to("direct:goodRoute")
>   .when().xpath("expression2)
>       .to("direct:badRoute");
> 
> So, i want to create the response for the http request in goodRoute and
> badRoute. But in real life, the response is just empty if i do so. Do i
> have to add an option to the direct route?
> 
> Thanks
>  martin
> 


-----
Ben O'Day
IT Consultant -http://consulting-notes.com

--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Set-response-by-a-second-route-through-direct-routing-tp4761827p4763955.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.