Return-Path: 
 <users-return-21767-apmail-camel-users-archive=camel.apache.org@camel.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A15568E7
	for <apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:56:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 17956 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2011 13:56:44 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17772 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2011 13:56:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@camel.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@camel.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@camel.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.camel.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17764 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2011 13:56:43 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:56:43 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:56:36 +0000
Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com)
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <morpheusandre@web.de>)
	id 1QgzvD-0004Hx-EZ
	for users@camel.apache.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:56:15 -0700
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A8?= <morpheusandre@web.de>
To: users@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <1310565375439-4582764.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMwm1vEbCUoQ-eDv+tuxoSXGDzA3_-qFO_zKPW908EBY0KrgTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1310114790251-4563945.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAGB5yNkOfpXrbh_yjb4nW+kvq2UNmM9xKav91TnEpwcqOFD8TA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1310140047545-4565242.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <1310144531121-4565526.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAGB5yNnWpSBsOtLULqK4O0difQO7rcJ0ANsWNQWmoETX-oz32g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1310146967988-4565674.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAMwm1vEbCUoQ-eDv+tuxoSXGDzA3_-qFO_zKPW908EBY0KrgTA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: whats the difference between these routes??
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

no it should cause i want that exception be propagated back to the caller, as
a hint, what has been going wrong.

Claus thx for the hint with the filter pattern, the only problem is, when
using it the  bean isAuthZBlocked isnt able to receive meanwhile incoming
messages from another route. 


<route>
        <from uri="direct:injectRequest"/>
        <filter>
         	<method ref="isAuthZBlocked" method="checkDirectInjectedRequest"/>
            <doTry>
                <to
uri="activemq:topic:services.global.xacml.authzRequests?transferException=true"/>
                <doCatch>
                    <exception>org.apache.camel.RuntimeCamelException
					</exception>
                    <process ref="ExceptionDeWrapper"/>
                </doCatch>
            </doTry>
        </filter>
    </route>

--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/whats-the-difference-between-these-routes-tp4563945p4582764.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.