camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Conceptual 'correctness' of using Camel Unit Tests
Date Fri, 06 May 2011 05:16:47 GMT
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Gert Villemos <gvillemos@yahoo.de> wrote:
> From the comments I conclude that we should apply both 'normal' unit tests
> and Camel unit tests (= integration tests).

There is no special Camel "correctness" about this. Its best practice
for any project.
To do both unit test and integration tests.

And there are other kind of tests such as performance and load tests.
And you can go great lengths and have disaster recovery tests as well.
etc.



>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Conceptual-correctness-of-using-Camel-Unit-Tests-tp4372286p4374003.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com/camelone2011/
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/

Mime
View raw message