Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 206612CFC for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37479 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 21:46:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 37446 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 21:46:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 37438 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 21:46:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:46:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dwhytock@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.173] (HELO mail-pv0-f173.google.com) (74.125.83.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:46:52 +0000 Received: by pvg3 with SMTP id 3so2987658pvg.32 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:46:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HmyltHkvkdc4aRoZ3LVs4o/0P3gtxqB/2Hnh9MEzP6g=; b=lVpBnoPKEYIGMmyI2O/xxNM5EMG14ycxR8z89F/RBpJvcuAgGVzxsWNUkHTz/X1N8C pyjxMIGf14nYBNyHIDj6JjYkhIcw/DbnVh+tBCpme6Dtkmn5dA6wd1ZUE654Owlwu/iJ z7YhEvKORmmK5BEpRbBuQm8rIrMYSSfEAWFYc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CAWEMUAT9/qnpzn9mY55CVQtFLvslemnXmBFoyIKvngDOxD7UlSsXaUxNUkTLErGpO m8HFO4S4YkoEWX1RYaJRPzofHEDjxI9vsjalFaXBSld+2xJvvwZGSSemmReKPWqM15lP WP9Tq/0RMTwN1zE5/TCBdrHzcC0Uz/JI+zjUg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.39.168 with SMTP id q8mr5460717pbk.118.1304113590907; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.63.65 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:46:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:46:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tcp monitor? From: Donald Whytock To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Checked out Wireshark...looks sophisticated, but can't monitor localhost. Java.net tcpmon works with localhost. It doesn't interlace the dialog packets, but it does the job. Thanks all... Don On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:04 PM, =C5=81ukasz Budnik wrote: > Hi Donald, > > And what about java.net tcpmon? > > http://java.net/projects/tcpmon/sources/svn/show/trunk/www?rev=3D69 > > Works like a charm for me. > > cheers, > =C5=81ukasz > > On 29 April 2011 20:54, Donald Whytock wrote: >> Hi all... >> >> Can someone recommend a decent package for tcp activity monitoring? >> I'm looking to observe the dialog between Camel Mail/Javamail and a >> POP3 server. =C2=A0Apache TCPMon seems to be too SOAP/Axis oriented. >> >> On a side note, should there perhaps be a Resources page for this, >> localhost-able apps for testing, that sort of thing? >> >> Don >> >