Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21526 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 16:40:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 16:40:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 77750 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 16:41:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 77699 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 16:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 77691 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 16:40:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:40:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.180] (HELO mail-qy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.216.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:40:53 +0000 Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so1209330qyk.11 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:40:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b8ChMHPlhiga6ICyOzXLBqRmfbl/9iL+AhVIUV8TWlU=; b=T9D9qbhphDiCrixeZvXTa4Il8OmJmWt6KF1J73+AeHglzy6GVXaafZisn6bnNd9lPK qFUYfHxA+Ec4XCyEGuVxEbL1eTGhhzLV2Cpt2unCuqxTws6lEdR8VxkEtV3vKzxGrJmF iQQh4f2dfk2ghgir38hIkGVm3ytZfFvXXfUAY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IYCYXTXJU6VRVVaD6Fjl9Xr7O37f21C11saVIE+gRoAJq1Nqg0BK9aWq2YXpWnXzOz 34CQB2nlg2PpuMXPpgKwKPFzhYf7DPCfjk3xwdsMDkt6R+iE9OZrk9f1khC1qj05vPhH ftj/xyAJQqiGyvje4pw5QDwn3gwnu1vreky1M= Received: by 10.224.196.67 with SMTP id ef3mr880171qab.160.1288888831863; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:40:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.186.68 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:40:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD2820F.5070609@softwaremind.pl> References: <4CD175D6.9000205@softwaremind.pl> <4CD26A4F.9020500@softwaremind.pl> <4CD26F54.7000903@softwaremind.pl> <4CD2820F.5070609@softwaremind.pl> From: Claus Ibsen Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:40:11 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ambiguous method invocations in bean binding To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi I created a ticket to track this https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-3311 2010/11/4 Pawe=C5=82 Weso=C5=82owski : > Hi, > > As a user I would like to see both features in camel. > > Camel should choose the most obvious method to invoke, the one that doesn= 't > need to convert payload, on his own. However, there are situation when it= is > needed to explicitly pick the method to call and if I had to choose from = the > two options given by Claus the one with type=3Djava.io.InputStream is bet= ter > in my opinion. > > -- > Pawe=C5=82 Weso=C5=82owski > > W dniu 11/04/2010 09:36 AM, Christian M=C3=BCller pisze: >> >> Hello! >> >> I made the tests and the patch against the latest version (2.6-SNAPSHOT)= . >> You will still receive this exception... >> I'm not sure which way we want to go (because of the note from Claus) - >> maybe both? >> >> Christian >> >> > > --=20 Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cibsen@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/